How QuickInsight analyzes decisions
QuickInsight is built for hard work decisions where another list of options is not helpful: stay or leave, offers, leadership calls, founder and equity fights.
What a Sharp First Read is trying to change
A Sharp First Read does not aim to sound supportive or complete. It aims to change the read.
That means surfacing the trade-offs, constraints, asymmetries, optionality, and deciding variables that actually move the choice, not restating the situation in cleaner language.
The first Sharp First Read is free.
We grade whether we got there
After a read is produced, QuickInsight scores it with QRS, our internal grader. QRS grades the analysis. It is not a user rating.
We grade each read for impact, craft, performance, efficiency, reliability, and safety.
In an audited corpus of 330 human decision sessions (closed 2026-09-24), mean QRS was about 8.0 / 10 and median about 8.4 / 10. Those numbers describe how those reads scored on our rubric, not how users rated us.
Two depths
Sharp First Read stays with the decision in front of you.
Position Audit steps back to the position you're making that decision from. It treats a career more like an investment position, using 26 interconnected lenses drawn from investment analysis. We do not list all 26 here.
Use Sharp First Read when you need a clearer cut on the choice in front of you. Use Position Audit when the choice is clearer than the position underneath it.
How we write from this work
When QuickInsight publishes from real sessions, we say how many audited reads we reviewed for that tension. We do not paste private conversations. We do not present QRS as customer reviews.
Example: Your Job May Be Making It Harder to Leave It, drawn from 38 stay-or-leave Sharp First Reads that started from burnout.
QuickInsight is informational only. It is not legal, tax, financial, medical, or other regulated professional advice. See the Disclaimer.